24th Clinical Virology Symposium
April 27 - 30, 2008 Daytona Beach, Florida, USA
Home About The Society PASCV Officers Membership Listserver Links Newsletter PASCV Awards Virology Meetings

Session I
Session II
Session III
Session IV
 

COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC HYBRIDS D3 DUET (RSV AND INFLUENZA), D3 DOUBLE DUET AND D3 ULTRA DFA SCREENING REAGENTS FOR THE DETECTION OF 8 RESPIRATORY VIRUSES IN DIRECT SPECIMENS

Session ID: M5
Author Name: M L. Ackerman Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, St Josephs Healthcare, Hamilton ON, CANADA
Country: Canada
Conference Session: Session II

 

Introduction: The rapid detection of respiratory viruses by direct immunofluorescence (DFA) has a significant impact on the management and treatment of patients. Currently in the HRLMP Regional Virology laboratory, nasal pharyngeal swabs (NPS) are routinely screened for Parainfluenza Virus 1, 2, 3, Influenza A and B, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Adenovirus and Human Metapneumovirus (MPV) with the D3 Ultra respiratory reagents. DHI has several other commercial kits for rapid detection of respiratory viruses available including: 1) D3 Duet DFA RSV/ Respiratory Virus screening reagent (DR) which differentiates RSV from others , 2) the D3 Duet DFA Influenza A/ Respiratory Virus screening reagent (DIA) (which differentiates Flu A from others, and 3) the D3 Double Duet(DD)* DFAKitTM (The DR and DIA reagents are available in the US, Canada and world wide, but currently FDA cleared for culture use only.  The *DD is currently available only outside the United States).  The “ex US” DD respiratory screening kit consists of control slides, mounting fluid, PBS and two reagent vials – one vial that detects Influenza A and differentiates it from Influenza B, Parainfluenza 1, 2, 3 and Adenovirus (which are not differentiated) and the second reagent vial for the detection and differentiation of   RSV/MPV. Two different labels (R-Phycoerythrin and Fluorescein isothiocyanate) bound to the monoclonal antibodies are utilized to detect and differentiate the virus targets, i.e. Flu A from “other” and MPV from RSV in the DD kit.

Objective: In this study D3Ultra, D3Duet and D3DD kits were compared for respiratory virus detection on direct specimens.  Direct specimen results were compared to previous direct and culture results using the D3Ultra for the purposes of standard methodology.

Method: 120 previously tested NPS specimens were used in this study. A 5 well slide was dotted with the cell pellet and stained with the D3 Duet RSV (DR) reagent, D3 Duet Influenza A (DIA) reagent, the D3 Double Duet (DD) reagent 1 and reagent 2 and D3 Ultra pool reagent. Slides were examined and evaluated for positivity and staining intensity by a technologist blinded to all previous results.

Results: 109 specimens were positive (73 RSV, 21 Influenza A, 6 MPV, 5 Influenza B, 2 Parainfluenza, 2 Adenovirus) and 11 negative by all staining methods. Two RSV specimens did not stain in all wells. There were no false positives detected.

Conclusions: Performance of all of the kits, were comparable.  Wells contained the same approximate number of positive cells and the staining intensity was similar with no nonspecific staining.